Burnt out shooting digital? Want to try a new challenge or just interested in this “lomo thing” all the hipster kids are talking about? Ded...
Burnt out shooting digital? Want to try a new challenge or just interested in this “lomo thing” all the hipster kids are talking about? Dedicated film enthusiast We would like to take you'll through our top film photography tips why we shoot film in today’s fast paced world of technology.
Tell most people today that you still shoot film and eventually the question will be asked: Why? Not pejoratively, but rather in a sideways, curious and strange way. Kind of like you just told them you put tomato sauce on your steak. Let’s face it in many ways they are right! We live in a day and age where technology is advancing so quickly and cheaply that art of photography has been democratised to the point where it’s hard to buy a phone without a camera! It’s easy to take pictures and with only the sunk cost of the initial investment there is minimal incremental cost to shooting digital. Although whether democratisation breeds commoditisation is a valid topic of debate, by and large these are all very good things. But it still begs the question why the heck would anyone want to shoot film again when digital is so much easier and cheaper in the long run? Simple. Shooting film has the potential to make you become a better photographer. And if you’ve ever found yourself burnt out with shooting digital, or needing a new challenge or change, getting back into film photography could very well save your photographic soul. Here are the Top 10 reasons on why you should shoot film again and how it can help improve your photography.
Do you even like the shot or is there a better one around the corner? Digital photography, with zero incremental cost of shooting, has taught most people to take the picture “just in case” or to take it with the intent to improve later in post production. Film turns that behaviour on its head because it’s not possible due to the cost and inconvenience of carrying around a campervan full of film. Besides, what’s the point of taking 10x more pictures than you really need? We all know Machine Gun Jack isn’t going to fix those 1000 pictures “in post”.
There is simply no substitute for physical hard copies when it comes to ensuring redundancy within your back up system. In addition, since there’s no guarantee that today’s technology will work with that of “tomorrow”, having the physical negative is the ultimate in future proofing your work. Technology obsolescence isn’t typically considered when backing up one’s files, but think of it this way: Imagine if your only back up was on 5.25” floppy disk drives, how well is that going to work out for you? Remember, you can always rescan negatives.
Tell most people today that you still shoot film and eventually the question will be asked: Why? Not pejoratively, but rather in a sideways, curious and strange way. Kind of like you just told them you put tomato sauce on your steak. Let’s face it in many ways they are right! We live in a day and age where technology is advancing so quickly and cheaply that art of photography has been democratised to the point where it’s hard to buy a phone without a camera! It’s easy to take pictures and with only the sunk cost of the initial investment there is minimal incremental cost to shooting digital. Although whether democratisation breeds commoditisation is a valid topic of debate, by and large these are all very good things. But it still begs the question why the heck would anyone want to shoot film again when digital is so much easier and cheaper in the long run? Simple. Shooting film has the potential to make you become a better photographer. And if you’ve ever found yourself burnt out with shooting digital, or needing a new challenge or change, getting back into film photography could very well save your photographic soul. Here are the Top 10 reasons on why you should shoot film again and how it can help improve your photography.
Film photography tips: Slow Down
Hard to do in a world where everything happens yesterday but slowing down is good for your creative mind. Unless one has a motor drive, it’s simply not possible to machine gun through a million pictures the way it can be done with digital.This depends entirely on the scope of your work of course, live action sport almost necessitates this type of fast shooting, but it can be an overkill at times if you’re taking portraits or landscapes and still life. The slow down that occurs with the ritualistic process of film the loading, winding, and the limited number of shots – provides an opportunity to stop and think about what you’re shooting. Can you frame it a different way, what about a different orientation?Do you even like the shot or is there a better one around the corner? Digital photography, with zero incremental cost of shooting, has taught most people to take the picture “just in case” or to take it with the intent to improve later in post production. Film turns that behaviour on its head because it’s not possible due to the cost and inconvenience of carrying around a campervan full of film. Besides, what’s the point of taking 10x more pictures than you really need? We all know Machine Gun Jack isn’t going to fix those 1000 pictures “in post”.
Gear
Now this depends entirely on what you’re after and the brands to which you’re loyal but generally speaking, high quality film gear can often be bought for a bargain. Granted the equipment can be quite old but the manufacturing quality and design of older film equipment is such that they remain workhorses to this very day. The classic Nikon FM2 or Leica M series being excellent examples. My current kit consists of a second hand Hasselblad 503CX with a waist level finder, A12 back and Zeiss 80mm/2.8 lens all from 1995. 21 years old, entirely manual and the camera is built like a Sherman tank! Yet this entire setup cost $1,200 and was serviced and cleaned prior to purchasing. Watching an image pop on a waist level finder with a wide open aperture is both surreal and unlike anything you’ll see on most DSLRs. Sure you can buy older digital equipment for even less but it’s arguably more useful as a collector’s item than a functional tool for photography. A Nikon D1 with a 2.7mp sensor or a Kodak DCS 420 with 1.5mp? Important pieces of technology from a historical standpoint sure, but that’s about it when it comes to usefulness today. Film gear, on the other hand, is rarely a victim of technological obsolescence because one is still exposing the same celluloid sheet coated with chemicals to a light source.Waiting
Unless you’re shooting Polaroid, film won’t give you instant gratification, you’ll need to wait. Wait until you have time to drop off your film to your local lab, and then further waiting until you get your developed film back. And you know what? It’s actually quite fun almost like the kid on Christmas day. Others may disagree and of course for professionals, this is likely no longer practical (particularly photojournalism) but it goes hand in hand with slowing down. It’s nice to sit back and enjoy the ride, and be pleasantly surprised when you get your film back. Maybe it’s tapping into the current new wave of nostalgia that’s all the rage currently but try it……you just might like it. How will this make you a better photographer? You’re focusing on the process and the art instead of the immediate gratification of the results. It’s like fine dining vs. fast food quicker is not always better.Commitment
If you go the way I did full manual Hasselblad you will no longer have technology as an assistant or a crutch to help you through the difficult times. You’ll need to learn how aperture, film speed, and shutter speed interact to create a well exposed image. No meter? No problem! The sunny rule of 16 is highly practical (and works!) and with enough practice you will get to the point where you don’t need a meter for shooting as your eyes learn to read the scene in terms of exposure. Not saying that one should throw away useful tools like meters and the like – but it’s amazingly free to be able to go out and take gorgeous shots because you understand the science, while your friends are waiting for their batteries to charge. Generally speaking, you will need to commit to your craft and understand it more when you shoot film because it’s not as convenient, it’s not as cheap, and it’s not as easy.Instant Archive
With cheap hard drive storage today, there’s no excuse not to have multiple back ups of your computer system and all files. But let’s face it, the administrative work that comes with the archival process is tedious at best and yet that fancy RAID-capable multiple volume storage array still has no defence to a 3 year old who enjoys sticking magnets to household objects. However with film you have an instant archive with the negatives, plus with most labs offering scanning services as well, you’ll be left with two offline archival copies: The actual film negative itself plus a CD/DVD with the scanned images.There is simply no substitute for physical hard copies when it comes to ensuring redundancy within your back up system. In addition, since there’s no guarantee that today’s technology will work with that of “tomorrow”, having the physical negative is the ultimate in future proofing your work. Technology obsolescence isn’t typically considered when backing up one’s files, but think of it this way: Imagine if your only back up was on 5.25” floppy disk drives, how well is that going to work out for you? Remember, you can always rescan negatives.
COMMENTS